<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rocky Mountain GYN &#38; Hormone Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmghc.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmghc.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Bisphosphonates and Esophageal Cancer</title>
		<link>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/oral-bisphosphonates-and-esophageal-cancer-2/</link>
		<comments>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/oral-bisphosphonates-and-esophageal-cancer-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moderator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bone Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rmghc.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bisphosphonates are a class of drug used to prevent and/or treat osteoporosis. It’s estimated that about 1.8 million American women have been prescribed bisphosphonates. They are known to cause serious esophagitis (inflammation or swelling of the esophagus) in some users. Reflux esophagitis is a known risk factor for cancer of the esophagus, leading many to &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bisphosphonates are a class of drug used to prevent and/or treat osteoporosis. It’s estimated that about 1.8 million American women have been prescribed bisphosphonates. They are known to cause serious esophagitis (inflammation or swelling of the esophagus) in some users. Reflux esophagitis is a known risk factor for cancer of the esophagus, leading many to wonder if esophagitis caused by bisphosphonates could lead to cancer as well.</p>
<p>Researchers in the United Kingdom analyzed data from the UK General Practice Research Database from January 1996 to December 2006. They compared instances of esophageal and gastric cancers in patients treated with oral bisphosphonates with a control group that had not taken the drugs. They discovered no difference in risk of cancer between patients prescribed bisphosphonates and those that had not taken them. It didn’t matter how long the patients had been on bisphosphonates, their risk was similar to patients’ that had never taken the drug. This doesn’t mean the drugs are completely safe or have no adverse side effects, but that cancer is not one risk you have to worry about. Your doctor can help you understand the risks and benefits of taking a bisphosphonate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/oral-bisphosphonates-and-esophageal-cancer-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metabolic Effects of Soy</title>
		<link>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/metabolic-effects-of-soy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/metabolic-effects-of-soy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moderator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Wellness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rmghc.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, a small study at the University Of Alabama School Of Medicine was undertaken to measure the effects of soy supplementation on menopausal women. Menopause is associated with increased abdominal girth, decreased insulin sensitivity, and an increase in circulating markers of inflammation. The women studied were given either a soy shake with isoflavones daily, or &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, a small study at the University Of Alabama School Of Medicine was undertaken to measure the effects of soy supplementation on menopausal women. Menopause is associated with increased abdominal girth, decreased insulin sensitivity, and an increase in circulating markers of inflammation. The women studied were given either a soy shake with isoflavones daily, or a casein placebo shake. At the beginning of the study and again after 3 months, body fat composition and distribution were measured along with glucose disposal and insulin secretion, C-Reactive Protein (a marker of inflammation), and serum lipid levels. Some of the results were not what the study authors expected. Total body fat, lean body mass and weight did not change in either group. However, soy supplementation improved body fat distribution and reduced total abdominal fat by 7.5% and subcutaneous abdominal fat by 9.1%. The casein group experienced an<strong> increase</strong> of 8.8% of total abdominal fat and 10% of subcutaneous abdominal fat. The soy had no significant effect on insulin, glucose, inflammation markers or lipids. What does all this information mean to you?</p>
<ul>
<li>Replacing some of your high-calorie, high-fat proteins with soy may be good for your heart. Excess fat around your mid-section puts you at risk for cardiovascular disease. Trading your usual breakfast for a soy shake with isoflavones can help shift fat away from your abdomen.</li>
<li>Adding soy into your diet to lower the high cholesterol you inherited from Grandpa Frank won’t help. If your high cholesterol comes from eating lots of fatty cuts of meat with alcohol daily, you’d probably get just as much benefit from switching to lean cuts of meat and passing on the beer as you would switching to soy products.</li>
<li>This study was very small and limited. It provides some good starting information…but more research should be done. Soy proteins with isoflavones have their place in a healthy diet, but they won’t be replacing a healthy lifestyle and medications. You should also be aware that soy acts very similar to estrogen in your body and can cause bloating, moodiness and hot flashes if you overdo it.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/metabolic-effects-of-soy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Look at the IUD</title>
		<link>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/a-new-look-at-the-iud-2/</link>
		<comments>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/a-new-look-at-the-iud-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Moderator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GYN Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rmghc.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women in America have been nervous about IUDs for many years. This is mostly due to the backlash from the Dalkon Shield, an IUD available from 1971 to 1974 that caused many pelvic infections, spontaneous abortions and even a few deaths. That device had a multi-filament string with an outer sheath that broke down in &#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women in America have been nervous about IUDs for many years. This is mostly due to the backlash from the Dalkon Shield, an IUD available from 1971 to 1974 that caused many pelvic infections, spontaneous abortions and even a few deaths. That device had a multi-filament string with an outer sheath that broke down in the body. This left an open pathway from the vagina, which normally contains many kinds of bacteria, to the uterus, which is sterile. After insertion, many women quickly developed Pelvic Inflammatory Disease from the introduction of bacteria into the uterus. This led to painful chronic infections, scarring, infertility and occasionally, death. The new generation of IUDs is very different from the Dalkon Shield. There are currently 2 IUD’s available in the United States. The Mirena is a device that releases levonorgestrel slowly into the body over a period of 5 years. The Paragard is a copper barrier device that maintains a physical barrier for 10 years. Is there a really a need for long-term birth control in the US? Consider the statistics: </p>
<ul>
<li>There are approximately 3 million unintended pregnancies in the US every year</li>
<li>In almost half of these pregnancies, the woman undergoes an abortion</li>
<li>Almost 50% of women have an unintended pregnancy by age 45</li>
<li>54% of women who have an abortion were using contraception during the month they became pregnant, usually a condom or oral contraceptive</li>
</ul>
<p>So are they safe? Let’s look at some of the major concerns with IUDs:</p>
<p><strong>Risk of Perforation of the Uterus During Placement:</strong> This risk comes primarily from the amount of training your physician has had. Overall, the risk of perforation has been reported as zero to 1.3%, very low when compared to the risks you face with pregnancy.</p>
<p><strong>Risk of Expulsion (your body rejecting the IUD and forcing it out):</strong> In a recent study, the rates of expulsion for levonorgestrel releasing IUDs and copper IUDs were compared. The rates of copper IUD expulsion were zero to 1.2% per year. The hormone releasing IUD expulsion rates were zero to 0.2% per year. There were no differences between women who had already had children and nulliparous women. It should be noted that these studies were done in Europe and did not use the Paragard copper IUD. A separate study of the Paragard showed a much lower expulsion rate.</p>
<p><strong>Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease:</strong> The risk of PID in IUD users is negligible; in fact, the Mirena may have a protective effect against infection. You don’t need prophylactic treatment of anti-biotics during insertion as once thought, and in fact, patients that test positive for Chlamydia and gonorrhea after insertion can be treated safely without removal and without increasing their risk of PID.</p>
<p><strong>Infertility:</strong> The risk of infertility has been linked to PID, which has been not been shown to be a concern with modern IUDs. American women have chosen the IUD at very low rates, about 5.5% for both types of IUD compared to 20% of women in France, primarily because of fear stemming from outdated information. Educate yourself on the birth control options available to you and speak to your physician about your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rmghc.com/2010/11/a-new-look-at-the-iud-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  rmghc.com/feed/ ) in 0.56678 seconds, on May 16th, 2012 at 4:16 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2012 at 4:16 pm UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  rmghc.com/feed/ ) in 0.11156 seconds, on May 20th, 2012 at 12:21 pm UTC. -->
